Patricia Kidd v. District of Columbia,appellees

D.C. Circuit

Patricia Kidd v. District of Columbia,appellees

214 F.3d 179, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 419, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12091, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1808, 2000 WL 679006

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 2000

Docket98-7075 & 98-7100

StatusPublished

This text of 214 F.3d 179 (Patricia Kidd v. District of Columbia,appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patricia Kidd v. District of Columbia,appellees, 214 F.3d 179, 341 U.S. App. D.C. 419, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 12091, 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1808, 2000 WL 679006 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinions

Chief Judge EDWARDS and Circuit Judges SENTELLE, TATEL and GARLAND would grant the petition.

A statement of Circuit Judge TATEL, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc, joined by Chief Judge EDWARDS and Circuit Judges SENTELLE and GARLAND, is attached.

Circuit Judge ROGERS did not participate in this matter.

ORDER

Per Curiam

The petition for rehearing en banc of amicus curiae and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the couit in regular active service did not vote in favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI