Pate v. Peterson

254 P. 1036, 123 Kan. 378, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 143
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedApril 9, 1927
DocketNo. 27,371
StatusPublished

This text of 254 P. 1036 (Pate v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pate v. Peterson, 254 P. 1036, 123 Kan. 378, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 143 (kan 1927).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one of forcible detainer against a tenant, who claimed privilege to occupy the premises until March 1, 1927. On his theory of the case, his term expired on March 1, 1927, and at the oral argument it appeared that he had vacated and the owner is now in possession. The result is, the question involved is moot, and the appeal is dismissed on the authority of Geiger v. Krein, 103 Kan. 176, 173 Pac. 298; Hall v. Briggs, 104 Kan. 277, 178 Pac. 447; O’Laughlin v. Prockish, 106 Kan. 623, 189 Pac. 385; Bryson v. Barrett, 108 Kan. 71, 193 Pac. 1063; Hesser v. Bale, 114 Kan. 750, 220 Pac. 274.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geinger v. Krein
173 P. 298 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1918)
Hall v. Briggs
178 P. 447 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1919)
O'Laughlin v. Prockish
189 P. 385 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1920)
Bryson v. Barrett
193 P. 1063 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1920)
Hesser v. Bale
220 P. 274 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 P. 1036, 123 Kan. 378, 1927 Kan. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pate-v-peterson-kan-1927.