Hesser v. Bale

220 P. 274, 114 Kan. 750, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 280
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedNovember 17, 1923
DocketNo. 24,762
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 220 P. 274 (Hesser v. Bale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hesser v. Bale, 220 P. 274, 114 Kan. 750, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 280 (kan 1923).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

On August 1, 1921, P. E. Hesser orally leased a farm to Aus Bale. A dispute arose between them as to whether the lease was for one year, as the landlord asserted, or for two, as the tenant claimed. At the end of the first year the former brought a proceeding under the forcible entry and detainer statute in which he recovered judgment for restitution of the premises and for costs, from which this appeal is taken. Assuming that the defendant’s version of the contract is correct, his right of possession under the lease has now expired. The controversy having become moot, the appeal is dismissed. (Geinger v. Krein, 103 Kan. 176, 173 Pac. 298.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill City Housing Authority v. Nevins
Court of Appeals of Kansas, 2024
Mueller v. Seiler
148 P.2d 266 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1944)
State ex rel. Wyman v. Smith
36 P.2d 956 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1934)
Zimmerman v. Craig
282 P. 940 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1929)
Pate v. Peterson
254 P. 1036 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 P. 274, 114 Kan. 750, 1923 Kan. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hesser-v-bale-kan-1923.