Passzehl v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.

259 A.D. 1050, 21 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7924
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 24, 1940·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon the verdict of a jury, in an action for personal injuries. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. The verdict of the jury is against the weight of the evidence. The plaintiff established that the hand brake on the truck was in a defective condition and that notice of such defect had been given to the defendant. It was the duty of the defendant to keep the truck and the hand brake in repair and it manifestly had failed to do so. In addition, the defendant brought into the case extraneous issues as to compensation payments received by the plaintiff that created a prejudicial atmosphere. A new trial should be had in the interest of justice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Close, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Passzehl v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc., 259 A.D. 1050, 21 N.Y.S.2d 386, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 1050 (Passzehl v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gutin v. Frank Mascali & Sons
22 Misc. 2d 1038 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Weinstein v. Prostkoff
23 Misc. 2d 376 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Kowler v. National Transportation Co.
265 A.D. 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Tuthill v. deVries
265 A.D. 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)