Paskoski v. Johnson

626 So. 2d 338, 1993 WL 469788
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 17, 1993
Docket93-2065
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 626 So. 2d 338 (Paskoski v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paskoski v. Johnson, 626 So. 2d 338, 1993 WL 469788 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

626 So.2d 338 (1993)

Joseph PASKOSKI, individually, and as trustee of the Gordon H. Johnson Restated Revocable Trust, Petitioner,
v.
Nancy C. JOHNSON, Barry Real Estate Fund I, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership and William E. Johnson, Respondents.

No. 93-2065.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 17, 1993.

*339 Charles L. Curtis of Doumar, Curtis, Cross, Laystrom & Perloff, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Walter G. Latimer of Walter G. Latimer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for respondent Nancy C. Johnson.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the petitioner that the trial court erred in determining that the trustee could not assert an attorney-client privilege or other privileges with respect to communications between the trustee and the trustee's lawyer and accountant in litigation between the trustee and a trust beneficiary. See In re Estate of Gory, 570 So.2d 1381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Barnett Banks Trust Company, N.A. v. Compson, 629 So.2d 849 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). We also agree with the petitioner that he is entitled to have the trial court conduct an in camera inspection of the materials specifically claimed to be exempt from discovery before those materials should be disclosed. See Allstate Insurance Company, Inc. v. Walker, 583 So.2d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). The petitioner retains the burden in the trial court to demonstrate his entitlement to protection from production for particular materials.

Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the order requiring production and direct the trial court to proceed in accord with this opinion.

DELL, C.J., and ANSTEAD and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murphy v. Gorman
271 F.R.D. 296 (D. New Mexico, 2010)
Greenberg Traurig, P.A. v. Bresnahan
2 So. 3d 1109 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Jacob v. Barton
877 So. 2d 935 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
First Union Nat. Bank v. Turney
824 So. 2d 172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
First Union Nat. Bank v. Whitener
715 So. 2d 979 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Paston v. WIGGS CONTRACTING
698 So. 2d 933 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Zanardi v. Zanardi
647 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 So. 2d 338, 1993 WL 469788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paskoski-v-johnson-fladistctapp-1993.