Knight v. Mastrianni
This text of 626 So. 2d 338 (Knight v. Mastrianni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to set aside an April 26, 1983 order concerning visitation, and the order granting the writ of ne exeat. We decline review of the order granting attorney’s fees since it does not fix the amount of the fee awarded. Thus, the issue of attorney’s fees is not ripe for appellate review. Hurtado v. Hurtado, 407 So.2d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA1981); Vanderslice v. Vanderslice, 396 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA1981).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
626 So. 2d 338, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 11566, 1993 WL 469787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-mastrianni-fladistctapp-1993.