Paseka v. Armour Co.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Paseka v. Armour Co.

280 N.W. 205, 68 N.D. 283, 1938 N.D. LEXIS 109

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 29, 1938

DocketFile No. 6520.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 280 N.W. 205 (Paseka v. Armour Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paseka v. Armour Co., 280 N.W. 205, 68 N.D. 283, 1938 N.D. LEXIS 109 (N.D. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

The issues in this case are similar to those involved in the case of Olson v. Armour Co., decided at this term, ante, 272,280 N.W. 200. In all, four cases were tried and appeal taken by the defendant in each case. Appellant says that the case of Olson v. Armour Co. is typical of all four cases. An examination of the record shows this to be correct. The same points are involved. The amount of damages allowed is the main issue.

This case, therefore, is controlled by the decision in Olson v. Armour Co., and for the reasons set forth in the opinion therein the judgment is affirmed.

CHRISTIANSON, Ch. J., and BURR and NUESSLE, JJ., concur.

MORRIS and SATHRE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The issues in this case are similar to those involved in the case of Olson v. Armour Co., decided at this term, ante, 272,280 N.W. 200. In all, four cases were tried and appeal taken by the defendant in each case. Appellant says that the case of Olson v. Armour Co. is typical of all four cases. An examination of the record shows this to be correct. The same points are involved. The amount of damages allowed is the main issue.

This case, therefore, is controlled by the decision in Olson v. Armour Co., and for the reasons set forth in the opinion therein the judgment is affirmed.

CHRISTIANSON, Ch. J., and BURR and NUESSLE, JJ., concur.

MORRIS and SATHRE, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 N.W. 205, 68 N.D. 283, 1938 N.D. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paseka-v-armour-co-nd-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack