Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Paschen v. State

Paschen v. State

539 So. 2d 1189, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 754, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1466, 1989 WL 25347
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1270
StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 1189 (Paschen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paschen v. State, 539 So. 2d 1189, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 754, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1466, 1989 WL 25347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. Appellant alleges and appellee concedes that the sentencing judge erred by departing from the recommended guideline sentence without giving written reasons for having done so. Hoag v. State, 523 So.2d 788 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoag v. State
523 So. 2d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 1189, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 754, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1466, 1989 WL 25347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paschen-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.