Hoag v. State
523 So. 2d 788, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 984, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1574, 1988 WL 34668
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 21, 1988·No. No. 87-1857·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This is an appeal from a sentence which departs from that recommended by the sentencing guidelines. No written reasons for the departure were given. That is error. State v, Oden, 478 So.2d 51 (Fla.1985); Matthews v. State, 486 So.2d 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoag v. State, 523 So. 2d 788, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 984, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1574, 1988 WL 34668 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
523 So. 2d 788 (Hoag v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. State
553 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Paschen v. State
539 So. 2d 1189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)