Paschal v. Tillman
30 S.E. 870, 105 Ga. 494, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 610
Opinion
The injunction prayed for in the present case, being man-datory in its nature, and its only purpose being to evict the defendants from land of which they were in possession and claiming title, there was, under the code of this -State, no error in sustaining their demurrer to the plaintiffs’ petition, which prayed for no remedy except that of injunction. See Vaughn v. Yawn, 103 Ga. 557, and authorities there cited.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paschal v. Tillman, 30 S.E. 870, 105 Ga. 494, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 610 (Ga. 1898).
30 S.E. 870 (Paschal v. Tillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horton v. Harvey
133 S.E.2d 35 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Braswell v. Palmer
11 S.E.2d 889 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Campbell v. Deal
195 S.E. 432 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Hart v. Atlanta Terminal Co.
58 S.E. 452 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Beacham v. Wrightsville & Tennille Railroad
54 S.E. 157 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Goodrich v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
41 S.E. 659 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)