Parvinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.

569 F. App'x 515

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The BIA didn’t err in adopting the immigration judge’s adverse credibility finding. The immigration judge listed “specific instances in the record that form[ed] the basis of the ... adverse credibility determination,” Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1042 (9th Cir.2010), including Singh’s voluntary return to India, discrepancies between the affidavits of Singh and his father, and petitioners’ inconsistent testimony regarding their place of residence and visa application process. Nothing in the record “compels a contrary conclusion.” Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir.2006).

DENIED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.