Parvinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 569 F. App'x 515 (Parvinder Singh v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
The BIA didn’t err in adopting the immigration judge’s adverse credibility finding. The immigration judge listed “specific instances in the record that form[ed] the basis of the ... adverse credibility determination,” Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1042 (9th Cir.2010), including Singh’s voluntary return to India, discrepancies *516 between the affidavits of Singh and his father, and petitioners’ inconsistent testimony regarding their place of residence and visa application process. Nothing in the record “compels a contrary conclusion.” Singh v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 1100, 1105 (9th Cir.2006).
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
569 F. App'x 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parvinder-singh-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2014.