Partridge v. Partridge

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 315

• Court: Court of Chancery of South Carolina
• Decided: July 1, 1724
• Status: Published

Opinion

The matter upon the Plaintiff’s Bill, and the Defendant’s Plea put in thereunto, being this day heard and debated before this Court in the presence of Counsel learned on both sides, Mr. Whitaker of the Complainants Counsel alledged that the Mortgage of the Slaves in dispute was the Act of a Feme-Covert: It was therefore prayed that the Complainants have leave to amend their Bill in that behalf; Which This Court held reasonable, and order the same accordingly; And that the Defendants put in their answer thereunto, in order that the same may be brought to a further hearing to Morrow, by Nine a Clock in the Morning.

Intr.

Cn: Southack Deputy Register