Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing, Inc.

Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing, Inc.

748 So. 2d 1047, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14222, 1999 WL 974142
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14219 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 27, 1999·No. No. 99-2635·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to petitioners re-filing the rule 1.540 motion in the trial court after this court resolves the pending related appeal. Ruffin v. Kingswood E. Condo. Assoc., 719 So.2d 951 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum, 636 So.2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

AFFIRMED.

POLEN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing, Inc., 748 So. 2d 1047, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14222, 1999 WL 974142 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

748 So. 2d 1047 (Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruffin v. KINGSWOOD E. CONDOMINIUM ASS'N
719 So. 2d 951 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum
636 So. 2d 579 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)