Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing, Inc.
747 So. 2d 981, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14219, 1999 WL 974140
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 27, 1999·No. No. 99-2634·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to petitioners re-filing the rule 1.540 motion in the trial court after this court resolves the pending related appeal. Ruffin v. Kingswood E. Condo. Assoc., 719 So.2d 951 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Flemenbaum v. Flemenbaum, 636 So.2d 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing, Inc., 747 So. 2d 981, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14219, 1999 WL 974140 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
747 So. 2d 981 (Parsons v. Whitaker Plumbing, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hart v. Baillie
851 So. 2d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)