Parsons v. State
This text of 429 S.W.2d 476 (Parsons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
The prosecution herein was upon complaint filed in corporation court. After [477]*477conviction in that court he appealed to the county court.
Judgment was rendered in the County Criminal Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County finding the appellant guilty of speeding, and assessing his punishment at a fine of $101. From this judgment appellant gave notice of appeal to this court.
In the complaint contained in the record no person is alleged as the affiant. No name appears in the blank space provided for the name of the affiant at the commencement of the complaint form. No name is signed to the complaint as affiant. The jurat contains no name as affiant. .
The complaint does not comply with the provisions of Art. 15.05, Sec. 4, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., which require that:
“It (complaint) must be signed by the affiant by writing his name or affixing his mark.”
For the reason pointed out, the complaint is void.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
429 S.W.2d 476, 1968 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parsons-v-state-texcrimapp-1968.