Parrish v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Parrish v. State

870 S.W.2d 394, 315 Ark. 736, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 66

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 7, 1994

DocketCR 93-458

StatusPublished

This text of 870 S.W.2d 394 (Parrish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parrish v. State, 870 S.W.2d 394, 315 Ark. 736, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 66 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants, Ron Parrish and Rose Parrish, by their attorney, have filed for a rule on the clerk.

Their attorney, Jon A. Williams admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellants, Ron Parrish and Rose Parrish, by their attorney, have filed for a rule on the clerk.

Their attorney, Jon A. Williams admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

870 S.W.2d 394, 315 Ark. 736, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-state-ark-1994.