Parrish v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Parrish v. State

870 S.W.2d 394, 315 Ark. 736, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 66

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parrish v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 313 Ark. 313 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 7, 1994·No. CR 93-458·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants, Ron Parrish and Rose Parrish, by their attorney, have filed for a rule on the clerk.

Their attorney, Jon A. Williams admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellants, Ron Parrish and Rose Parrish, by their attorney, have filed for a rule on the clerk.

Their attorney, Jon A. Williams admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Parrish v. State, 870 S.W.2d 394, 315 Ark. 736, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 66 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

870 S.W.2d 394 (Parrish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.