Parrish v. State

853 S.W.2d 284, 313 Ark. 313, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 315
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 24, 1993·No. CR 93-458·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Clerk of the Court refused to docket this case when the record was presented. Appellants, by their attorney, Jon A. Williams, have filed a motion for a Rule on the Clerk. The motion contends that the record was timely filed. It was not timely filed, and we deny the motion.

It is an attorney’s duty to timely file the record. In this case the record was late because one of the orders of extension was not entered before the period for filing the record had expired. See Ark. R. App. P. 5. In addition, the record was tendered more than seven months after the entry of the judgment. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(b). If the attorney will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not timely filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrish v. State, 853 S.W.2d 284, 313 Ark. 313, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 315 (Ark. 1993).

853 S.W.2d 284 (Parrish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rayford v. State
920 S.W.2d 839 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1996)