Parrish v. Parrish

389 So. 2d 8
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 1980·No. 79-2071·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

389 So.2d 8 (1980)

Josephine R. PARRISH, Appellant,
v.
Clyde C. PARRISH, Appellee.

No. 79-2071.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 21, 1980.

Nachwalter, Christie & Falk, Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.

Jack P. Attias, Key Biscayne, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant's motion to adopt the order of the trial court recommending a new trial in this cause upon its finding that an essential part of the appellate record cannot be reconstructed on this appeal is granted, the judgment under review is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to order a new trial in this cause. Van Scoyoc v. York, 173 So.2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 179 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1965).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrish v. Parrish, 389 So. 2d 8 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

389 So. 2d 8 (Parrish v. Parrish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bradshaw v. State
884 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Galindez v. State
884 So. 2d 1077 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris
469 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Moser v. Department of Labor & Employment Security
450 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)