Parrish v. Parrish
This text of 389 So. 2d 8 (Parrish v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Josephine R. PARRISH, Appellant,
v.
Clyde C. PARRISH, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Nachwalter, Christie & Falk, Jay M. Levy, Miami, for appellant.
Jack P. Attias, Key Biscayne, for appellee.
Before HUBBART, C.J., and NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The appellant's motion to adopt the order of the trial court recommending a new trial in this cause upon its finding that an essential part of the appellate record cannot be reconstructed on this appeal is granted, the judgment under review is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to order a new trial in this cause. Van Scoyoc v. York, 173 So.2d 483 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 179 So.2d 214 (Fla. 1965).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 So. 2d 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parrish-v-parrish-fladistctapp-1980.