Moser v. Department of Labor & Employment Security

450 So. 2d 582, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13047
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 1984·No. No. AX-332·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Unemployment Appeals Commission notified this court that the tape recording of the hearing held below, from which the transcript was to be made, was inadvertently erased. The parties were unable to produce a statement of the evidence pursuant to Rule 9.200(b)(3), Fla.R.App.P., and therefore request that the cause be remanded for a de novo hearing.

Due to the above stated circumstances, the final order is vacated and the cause remanded for a hearing de novo. See Parrish v. Parrish, 389 So.2d 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Vernell v. Edge, Inc., 389 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Jackson v. State, 308 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975).

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moser v. Department of Labor & Employment Security, 450 So. 2d 582, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13047 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

450 So. 2d 582 (Moser v. Department of Labor & Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold Lumber Company v. Harris
469 So. 2d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)