Moser v. Department of Labor & Employment Security

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moser v. Department of Labor & Employment Security

450 So. 2d 582, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13047

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 1984

DocketNo. AX-332

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 450 So. 2d 582 (Moser v. Department of Labor & Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moser v. Department of Labor & Employment Security, 450 So. 2d 582, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13047 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Unemployment Appeals Commission notified this court that the tape recording of the hearing held below, from which the transcript was to be made, was inadvertently erased. The parties were unable to produce a statement of the evidence pursuant to Rule 9.200(b)(3), Fla.R.App.P., and therefore request that the cause be remanded for a de novo hearing.

Due to the above stated circumstances, the final order is vacated and the cause remanded for a hearing de novo. See Parrish v. Parrish, 389 So.2d 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Vernell v. Edge, Inc., 389 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Jackson v. State, 308 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975).

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Unemployment Appeals Commission notified this court that the tape recording of the hearing held below, from which the transcript was to be made, was inadvertently erased. The parties were unable to produce a statement of the evidence pursuant to Rule 9.200(b)(3), Fla.R.App.P., and therefore request that the cause be remanded for a de novo hearing.

Due to the above stated circumstances, the final order is vacated and the cause remanded for a hearing de novo. See Parrish v. Parrish, 389 So.2d 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Vernell v. Edge, Inc., 389 So.2d 327 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Jackson v. State, 308 So.2d 600 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1975).

ERVIN, C.J., and THOMPSON and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

450 So. 2d 582, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moser-v-department-of-labor-employment-security-fladistctapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack