Parra v. Coconut Grove Bank
This text of 146 So. 3d 56 (Parra v. Coconut Grove Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lisbeth Parra appeals from a trial court order resetting a foreclosure sale. Because the issues raised in Parra’s brief relate only to the alleged illegality of the underlying foreclosure action and do not address any alleged errors in the order on appeal, we affirm. See Echeguren v. Citibank, N.A., 133 So.3d 1174 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (“[T]he issues raised in the appellants’ brief relate to the 2009 final judgment of foreclosure and appellants’ motion to vacate same. The issues do not relate to the order resetting foreclosure sale, which is the subject of appellants’ notice of appeal.”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 So. 3d 56, 2014 WL 1493565, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parra-v-coconut-grove-bank-fladistctapp-2014.