Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Echeguren v. Citibank, N.A.

Echeguren v. Citibank, N.A.

133 So. 3d 1174, 2014 WL 750512, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2741
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2014
DocketNo. 4D13-2931
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 So. 3d 1174 (Echeguren v. Citibank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Echeguren v. Citibank, N.A., 133 So. 3d 1174, 2014 WL 750512, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2741 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is summarily affirmed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315, as the initial brief fails to present a preliminary basis for reversal. Specifically, the issues raised in the appellants’ brief relate to the 2009 final judgment of foreclosure and appellants’ motion to vacate same. The issues do not relate to the order resetting foreclosure sale, which is the subject of appellants’ notice of appeal.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parra v. Coconut Grove Bank
146 So. 3d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 3d 1174, 2014 WL 750512, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/echeguren-v-citibank-na-fladistctapp-2014.