Paroline v. United States

134 S. Ct. 1157, 188 L. Ed. 2d 145, 571 U.S. 1188, 82 U.S.L.W. 3491, 2014 WL 6578292014, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1011
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paroline v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 S. Ct. 1710
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 21, 2014·No. No. 12–8561.·Published

Opinion

Motion of respondent Amy Unknown for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument granted. Other parties may file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 3,000 words each, addressing the effect of our decision in Burrage v. United States, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 881, 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014), on this case, on or before Friday, March 7, 2014.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paroline v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1157, 188 L. Ed. 2d 145, 571 U.S. 1188, 82 U.S.L.W. 3491, 2014 WL 6578292014, 2014 U.S. LEXIS 1011 (U.S. 2014).

134 S. Ct. 1157 (Paroline v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burrage v. United States
134 S. Ct. 881 (Supreme Court, 2014)