Paroline v. United States
570 U.S. 931, 186 L. Ed. 2d 932, 133 S. Ct. 2886, 81 U.S.L.W. 3714, 2013 WL 497856, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4943
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 27, 2013·No. No. 12–8561.·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted limited to the following question: What, if any, causal relationship or nexus between the defendant's conduct and the victim's harm or damages must the government or the victim establish in order to recover restitution under
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paroline v. United States, 570 U.S. 931, 186 L. Ed. 2d 932, 133 S. Ct. 2886, 81 U.S.L.W. 3714, 2013 WL 497856, 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4943 (2013).
570 U.S. 931 (Paroline v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Michael Monzel
930 F.3d 470 (D.C. Circuit, 2019)
Teresa Prewett v. Stanely Weems
749 F.3d 454 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
In re the Estate of Pawlik
845 N.W.2d 249 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2014)
United States v. David Hatcher
559 F. App'x 300 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Xavier Degollado
547 F. App'x 592 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Julian Gonzalez
540 F. App'x 465 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Lundquist
731 F.3d 124 (Second Circuit, 2013)