Parnell v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Parnell v. City of Atlanta

327 S.E.2d 569, 173 Ga. App. 602, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1633

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 28, 1985

Docket69313

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 327 S.E.2d 569 (Parnell v. City of Atlanta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parnell v. City of Atlanta, 327 S.E.2d 569, 173 Ga. App. 602, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1633 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, Virginia V. Parnell, appeals her conviction of the traffic offense of failure to yield at a stop sign. Held:

The City of Atlanta contends that jurisdiction of this appeal lies with the Fulton County Superior Court. We agree. The City Court of Atlanta is a constitutional city court. See Georgia Constitution of 1945, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. I (Code Ann. § 2-3601 (now Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. I, Georgia Constitution of 1983)); and Ga. L. 1967, pp. 3360, 3361. Appeals from a constitutional city court can be within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals. OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). However, although this traffic offense was originally charged using the Uniform Traffic Citation and Complaint Form (see OCGA Title 40, Chapter 13), following a motion to dismiss by the defendant, the Solicitor amended the complaint form to allege a violation of a city ordinance.

This court held, in Williams v. City of Atlanta, 135 Ga. App. 765, *603 766 (219 SE2d 17), where the prosecution in the City Court of Atlanta was not under the Traffic Violations Bureau Act but was a conviction of an ordinance “certiorari in the superior court was the proper remedy, and the appeal must be dismissed.”

Decided February 28, 1985. Ronald W. Parnell, for appellant. Louise T. Norwood, Solicitor, J. Stratton Leedy III, Michael White, Assistant Solicitors, for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Beasley, J. concurs. Carley, J., concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

The defendant, Virginia V. Parnell, appeals her conviction of the traffic offense of failure to yield at a stop sign. Held:

The City of Atlanta contends that jurisdiction of this appeal lies with the Fulton County Superior Court. We agree. The City Court of Atlanta is a constitutional city court. See Georgia Constitution of 1945, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. I (Code Ann. § 2-3601 (now Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. I, Georgia Constitution of 1983)); and Ga. L. 1967, pp. 3360, 3361. Appeals from a constitutional city court can be within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals. OCGA § 5-6-34 (a). However, although this traffic offense was originally charged using the Uniform Traffic Citation and Complaint Form (see OCGA Title 40, Chapter 13), following a motion to dismiss by the defendant, the Solicitor amended the complaint form to allege a violation of a city ordinance.

This court held, in Williams v. City of Atlanta, 135 Ga. App. 765, *603 766 (219 SE2d 17), where the prosecution in the City Court of Atlanta was not under the Traffic Violations Bureau Act but was a conviction of an ordinance “certiorari in the superior court was the proper remedy, and the appeal must be dismissed.”

Decided February 28, 1985. Ronald W. Parnell, for appellant. Louise T. Norwood, Solicitor, J. Stratton Leedy III, Michael White, Assistant Solicitors, for appellee.

Appeal dismissed.

Beasley, J. concurs. Carley, J., concurs in the judgment only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

327 S.E.2d 569, 173 Ga. App. 602, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parnell-v-city-of-atlanta-gactapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack