Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Supreme Court

Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

246 U.S. 658, 38 S. Ct. 425, 62 L. Ed. 926, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1616

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 29, 1918·No. No. 478·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with [659]*659costs upon, the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.

Mr. Arthur E. -Griffin and Mr. Thomas B. McMariin for plaintiff in error. Mr. Neman H. Field for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with [659]*659costs upon, the authority of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 673; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Koennecke, 239 U. S. 352, 355; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Knapp, 240 U. S. 464, 466; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. v. Whitacre, 242 U. S. 169.

Mr. Arthur E. -Griffin and Mr. Thomas B. McMariin for plaintiff in error. Mr. Neman H. Field for defendant in error.

Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co., 246 U.S. 658, 38 S. Ct. 425, 62 L. Ed. 926, 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1616 (1918).

Pincite

246 U.S. 658 (Parmelee v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related