Parks v. Stynchcombe

192 S.E.2d 335, 229 Ga. 450, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 642
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 8, 1972
Docket27329
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 192 S.E.2d 335 (Parks v. Stynchcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parks v. Stynchcombe, 192 S.E.2d 335, 229 Ga. 450, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 642 (Ga. 1972).

Opinion

Grice, Presiding Justice.

In this appeal from the denial of the writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner alleged that his confinement was illegal for stated reasons. The respondent denied the essential allegations of the petition. However, it appears that the appellant has been fully discharged from custody during the pendency of this appeal, and therefore the issue involved in the denial of the writ of habeas corpus is now moot. See Cook v. Lowry, 148 Ga. 516 (97 SE 440); Harris v. Chappell, 219 Ga. 522 (133 SE2d 855).

The motion to dismiss the appeal is meritorious.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. State
259 S.E.2d 145 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 S.E.2d 335, 229 Ga. 450, 1972 Ga. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parks-v-stynchcombe-ga-1972.