Harris v. Chappell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Harris v. Chappell

133 S.E.2d 855, 219 Ga. 522, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 496

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 2, 1963

Docket22276

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 S.E.2d 855 (Harris v. Chappell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harris v. Chappell, 133 S.E.2d 855, 219 Ga. 522, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 496 (Ga. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Almand, Justice.

The plaintiffs in error in their bill of exceptions assign error on the order of the trial court refusing, on their petition for the writ of habeas corpus, to discharge them from the custody of the defendant in error, the Sheriff of Sumter County. Counsel for all the parties have advised this court that none of the plaintiffs in error are now in the custody of the Sheriff of Sumter County by virtue of their arrest under the warrants enumerated in their petition for the writ of [523]*523habeas corpus. Therefore the questions raised in their bill of exceptions are now moot and the writ of error is

Submitted November 13, 1963 Decided December 2, 1963. C. B. King, D. L. Hollowell, Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Michael Meltsner, for plaintiffs in error. Stephen Pace, Jr., contra.

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Almand, Justice.

The plaintiffs in error in their bill of exceptions assign error on the order of the trial court refusing, on their petition for the writ of habeas corpus, to discharge them from the custody of the defendant in error, the Sheriff of Sumter County. Counsel for all the parties have advised this court that none of the plaintiffs in error are now in the custody of the Sheriff of Sumter County by virtue of their arrest under the warrants enumerated in their petition for the writ of [523]*523habeas corpus. Therefore the questions raised in their bill of exceptions are now moot and the writ of error is

Submitted November 13, 1963 Decided December 2, 1963. C. B. King, D. L. Hollowell, Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Michael Meltsner, for plaintiffs in error. Stephen Pace, Jr., contra.

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.E.2d 855, 219 Ga. 522, 1963 Ga. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harris-v-chappell-ga-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack