Parks v. State

246 So. 3d 1296
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8833
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2018·No. Case No. 5D18-1557·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*1297We affirm the order entered by the circuit court in Case No. 2017-100954-CFDL denying Appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief filed in that case, albeit not for the reasons provided by the court. We do so without prejudice to Appellant timely raising in Case No. 2007-000909-CFAWS his instant claim that the forfeiture of gain time by the Department of Corrections ("DOC") thwarted his plea bargain, as that appears to be the case so affected by the forfeiture. See Dellahoy v. State , 816 So.2d 1253, 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) ("The DOC's forfeiture of the gain time cannot be countermanded by the court, but neither can that forfeiture thwart the plea bargain.").

AFFIRMED, without prejudice.

TORPY, WALLIS, and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parks v. State, 246 So. 3d 1296 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

246 So. 3d 1296 (Parks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dellahoy v. State
816 So. 2d 1253 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)