Parks v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8833
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2018·No. 18-0796·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 1, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-796 Lower Tribunal No. 96-38947 ________________

Givanni Parks, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge.

Givanni Parks, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and SUAREZ and SCALES, JJ.

SUAREZ, J.

Givanni Parks appeals from the trial court’s denial of a post-conviction

petition styled as a petition for habeas corpus. We conclude that the trial court properly denied the appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as it consisted

solely of arguments made by him in prior unsuccessful post-conviction motions.

Appellant raises two arguments: that his sentence is illegal and he did not violate

his plea agreement. This Court has previously reviewed and dismissed those

arguments. See Parks v. State, 863 So. 2d 382 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). As such, we

consider this petition as if filed as a 3.850 motion. We therefore affirm the trial

court’s denial of Park’s petition as successive.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parks v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Parks v. State (Parks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parks v. State
863 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)