Parkinson v. Parkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Parkinson v. Parkinson

295 A.D.2d 910, 743 N.Y.S.2d 761, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6196

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2002

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 295 A.D.2d 910 (Parkinson v. Parkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Parkinson v. Parkinson, 295 A.D.2d 910, 743 N.Y.S.2d 761, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal and cross appeal from parts of a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Marshall, J.), entered April 18, 2001, that, inter alia, distributed the parties’ marital property.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting plaintiffs objection to the Referee’s amended report concerning the parcel of real property located at 56 Christine Drive, vacating that part of the Referee’s amended report concerning that parcel of real property, and providing that the [911]*911parcel of real property located at 56 Christine Drive is plaintiffs separate property and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Parkinson v Parkinson ([appeal No. 1] 295 AD2d 909). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hayes, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal and cross appeal from parts of a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Marshall, J.), entered April 18, 2001, that, inter alia, distributed the parties’ marital property.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting plaintiffs objection to the Referee’s amended report concerning the parcel of real property located at 56 Christine Drive, vacating that part of the Referee’s amended report concerning that parcel of real property, and providing that the [911]*911parcel of real property located at 56 Christine Drive is plaintiffs separate property and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Parkinson v Parkinson ([appeal No. 1] 295 AD2d 909). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hayes, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 A.D.2d 910, 743 N.Y.S.2d 761, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkinson-v-parkinson-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack