Parkin v. Unity Protective Insurance

218 A.D. 842
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The notice is improper in form. Such a notice should inform the adverse party whether the moving party desires to examine the adverse party or a witness. By the notice plaintiff also seeks to examine as to matters upon which defendant has the burden of proof. Such an examination is not permitted without proof of some special circumstances showing that plaintiff is entitled thereto. The motion for examination may be renewed upon proper papers. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parkin v. Unity Protective Insurance, 218 A.D. 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

218 A.D. 842 (Parkin v. Unity Protective Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldberg v. Hommel
250 A.D. 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Public National Bank v. National City Bank
185 N.E. 395 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)