Parkin v. Unity Protective Insurance

218 A.D. 842
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1926
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 218 A.D. 842 (Parkin v. Unity Protective Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parkin v. Unity Protective Insurance, 218 A.D. 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The notice is improper in form. Such a notice should inform the adverse party whether the moving party desires to examine the adverse party or a witness. By the notice plaintiff also seeks to examine as to matters upon which defendant has the burden of proof. Such an examination is not permitted without proof of some special circumstances showing that plaintiff is entitled thereto. The motion for examination may be renewed upon proper papers. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldberg v. Hommel
250 A.D. 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Public National Bank v. National City Bank
185 N.E. 395 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 A.D. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkin-v-unity-protective-insurance-nyappdiv-1926.