Goldberg v. Hommel
This text of 250 A.D. 870 (Goldberg v. Hommel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting defendant’s cross-motion in a negligence action to examine plaintiff Samuel Goldberg before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Defendant seeks to examine plaintiff Samuel Goldberg as to matters upon which plaintiffs have the burden of proof. Such an examination is not permitted in the absence of proof of some special or unusual circumstances showing defendant is entitled thereto. (Parkin v. Unity Protective Ins. Assn., No. 1, 218 App. Div. 842.) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 870, 295 N.Y.S. 157, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-hommel-nyappdiv-1937.