Parkes v. NYU Langone Health
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TIFFANY ANNEPARKES, SSS
Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 8099 (KMW) JUDGMENT NYU LANGONE HEALTH; GRAMERCY GYNECOLOGY, Defendants. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 21, 2025, the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(1), and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York July 22, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court
BY: K. Me “€ Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parkes v. NYU Langone Health (Parkes v. NYU Langone Health) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.