Parkes v. NYU Langone Health

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 23, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-08099·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TIFFANY ANNEPARKES, SSS

Plaintiff, -against- 24 CIVIL 8099 (KMW) JUDGMENT NYU LANGONE HEALTH; GRAMERCY GYNECOLOGY, Defendants. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 21, 2025, the Court has dismissed Plaintiff's amended complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(1), and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York July 22, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court

BY: K. Me “€ Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parkes v. NYU Langone Health, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Parkes v. NYU Langone Health (Parkes v. NYU Langone Health) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)