Parker v. State

292 S.W.3d 586, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2009 WL 2949035
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. ED 91667·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*587 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Ashun Parker, appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. State, 292 S.W.3d 586, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1345, 2009 WL 2949035 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

292 S.W.3d 586 (Parker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jeramie Reno v. Robin R. Gonzales
489 S.W.3d 900 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)