Parker v. State

235 S.W.3d 575, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1188, 2007 WL 2416836
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 28, 2007·No. No. ED 89122·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronnie Parker appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Re-open his Rule 29.151 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court was justified in denying his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Edgington v. State, 189 S.W.3d 703, 707 (Mo.App. W.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. State, 235 S.W.3d 575, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1188, 2007 WL 2416836 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

235 S.W.3d 575 (Parker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Edgington v. State
189 S.W.3d 703 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)