Parker v. State
This text of 235 S.W.3d 575 (Parker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Ronnie Parker appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Re-open his Rule 29.151 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court was justified in denying his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Edgington v. State, 189 S.W.3d 703, 707 (Mo.App. W.D.2006). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 S.W.3d 575, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1188, 2007 WL 2416836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-state-moctapp-2007.