Parker v. State
616 So. 2d 631, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4554, 1993 WL 120838
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 570 So. 2d 1048 →
Opinion
AFFIRMED. Although the state concedes that the trial court erred in refusing to allow appellant to adduce testimony challenging the voluntariness of his statement to a sheriff’s detective, see Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 882, 102 S.Ct. 369, 70 L.Ed.2d 195 (1981), the error was harmless in this case. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.[632]*6321986). We find no error in appellant’s sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parker v. State, 616 So. 2d 631, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4554, 1993 WL 120838 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
616 So. 2d 631 (Parker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palmes v. State
397 So. 2d 648 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Johnson v. Florida
454 U.S. 882 (Supreme Court, 1981)