Parker v. State
351 So. 2d 82
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 318 So. 2d 502 →
Opinion
Convictions for robbery and burglary. The prosecutor’s interrogation of the accused concerning a prior larceny charge was improper, there having been no conviction, and defense counsel’s objection was sustained. There was no request either for a mistrial or a curative instruction. No error on the part of the trial judge is therefore demonstrated. The interrogation is not shown to have deprived appellant of a fair trial.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parker v. State, 351 So. 2d 82 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
351 So. 2d 82 (Parker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.