Parker v. State
350 So. 2d 564, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16490
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Parker v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 318 So. 2d 502 →
Opinion
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resen-tencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975), Smith v. State, 310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). Moreover, the sentence imprisons appellant “at hard labor” for which there is no statutory authority. Speller v. State, 305 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parker v. State, 350 So. 2d 564, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16490 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).
350 So. 2d 564 (Parker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Speller v. State
305 So. 2d 231 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Smith v. State
310 So. 2d 770 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)