Parker v. State

39 Ala. 365
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 15, 1864·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

STONE, J.

Bank-notes, and paper issued to circulate as money, have some of the properties of money.—See Corbett v. The State, 31 Ala. 329. But it cannot be affirmed, as matter of law, that they are worth, in money, the amount which their face specifies.—See Carlisle v. Davis, 7 Ala. 42; Wilson v. Jones, 8 Ala. 536. Specie must be regarded as the standard of value in this country, and any other standard would not only violate principle, but would lead to the most embarrassing fluctuations and uncertainty. The charge asked, as to value, should have been given.

[2.] There is nothing in the objection that the property was misdescribed.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. State, 39 Ala. 365 (Ala. 1864).

39 Ala. 365 (Parker v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drakeford v. State
79 So. 2d 443 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1955)
Cook v. State
65 So. 2d 277 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
Smith v. State
2 So. 2d 341 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1941)
Brannon v. State
160 So. 726 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1934)
Mathis v. State
69 So. 697 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1915)
Johnson v. State
68 So. 687 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Marsh v. State
57 So. 387 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Myers v. State
84 Ala. 11 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Lavender v. State
60 Ala. 60 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1877)
Watson v. State
55 Ala. 150 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)