Lavender v. State
60 Ala. 60
Opinion
A hog, the property of a married woman, living with her husband, who has possession of it, is not incorrectly described, in the indictment for stealing- it, as the property of the husband. — Davis v. The State, 17 Ala. 415. And a pig, four or five months old, is a hog, within the meaning of section 4358 (3706) of the Code of 1876, making it grand larceny to steal any “hog, sheep, or goat,” &c. — See Parker v. The State, 39 Ala. 365.
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lavender v. State, 60 Ala. 60 (Ala. 1877).
60 Ala. 60 (Lavender v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Springfield v. State
506 So. 2d 376 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Mauldin v. State
376 So. 2d 788 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1979)
Blackman v. State
179 So. 389 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1937)
Rollins v. State
98 Ala. 79 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
Kennedy v. State
31 Fla. 428 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1893)
Rutledge v. State
88 Ala. 85 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Pfister v. State
84 Ala. 432 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Robinson v. State
84 Ala. 434 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Ellis v. State
76 Ala. 90 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)