Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/Lavender v. State

Lavender v. State

60 Ala. 60
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 60 Ala. 60 (Lavender v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lavender v. State, 60 Ala. 60 (Ala. 1877).

Opinion

MANNING, J.

A hog, the property of a married woman, living with her husband, who has possession of it, is not incorrectly described, in the indictment for stealing- it, as the property of the husband. — Davis v. The State, 17 Ala. 415. And a pig, four or five months old, is a hog, within the meaning of section 4358 (3706) of the Code of 1876, making it grand larceny to steal any “hog, sheep, or goat,” &c. — See Parker v. The State, 39 Ala. 365.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Springfield v. State
506 So. 2d 376 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Mauldin v. State
376 So. 2d 788 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1979)
Blackman v. State
179 So. 389 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1937)
Rollins v. State
98 Ala. 79 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
Kennedy v. State
31 Fla. 428 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1893)
Rutledge v. State
88 Ala. 85 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1889)
Pfister v. State
84 Ala. 432 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Robinson v. State
84 Ala. 434 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Ellis v. State
76 Ala. 90 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Ala. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavender-v-state-ala-1877.