Parker v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: February 28, 2024

* * * * * * * * * * * * * JAMES A. PARKER, * UNPUBLISHED * Petitioner, * No. 18-602V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC for Petitioner. Rachelle Bishop, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS1

On April 26, 2018, James A. Parker (“Petitioner”) filed a petition in the National Vaccine Injury Program2 alleging that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine he received on November 3, 2016, he suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”). Petition at Preamble (ECF No. 1). On January 20, 2023, the undersigned issued a Decision Based on Stipulation. Decision Based on Stipulation dated Jan. 20, 2023 (ECF No. 85).

1 Because this unpublished Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018) (“Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All citations in this Decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.

1 On July 18, 2023, Petitioner filed an application for attorneys’ fees and costs. Petitioner’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Pet. Mot.”), filed July 18, 2023 (ECF No. 90). Petitioner requests compensation in the amount of $52,677.73, representing $43,585.40 in attorneys’ fees and $9,092.33 in costs. Id. at 1-2, 21. Pursuant to General Order No. 9, Petitioner warrants that he has not personally incurred any costs in pursuit of his claim for compensation. Id. at 61. Respondent filed his response on July 27, 2023, stating he “is satisfied the statutory requirements for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs are met in this case.” Respondent’s Response to Pet. Mot., filed July 27, 2023, at 2 (ECF No. 91). Petitioner filed a reply on July 27, 2023, “concur[ring] with Respondent’s recommendation that Special Master Dorsey exercise her discretion and determine a reasonable award for attorney’s fees and costs in this case.” Pet. Reply to Response to Pet. Mot., filed July 27, 2023, at 1 (ECF No. 92). The matter is now ripe for disposition.

Petitioner requests the following hourly rates for the work of his counsel: for Ms. Nancy Meyers, $430.00 per hour for work performed in 2021, $460.00 per hour for work performed in 2022, and $490.00 per hour for work performed in 2023; and for Ms. Lisa Roquemore, $447.00 per hour for work performed in 2022. Petitioner also requests rates between $139.00 and $165.00 per hour for work of his counsel’s paralegals from 2021 to 2023.

The undersigned finds the rates are consistent with what counsel have previously been awarded for their Vaccine Program work, and finds them to be reasonable herein. The undersigned has reviewed the submitted billing entries and finds the total number of hours billed to be reasonable and will award them in full. Lastly, the undersigned has reviewed the requested costs and finds them to be reasonable and supported with appropriate documentation. Accordingly, the full amount of costs shall be awarded.

Therefore, the undersigned finds no cause to reduce the requested hours or rates, or the requested costs.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. § 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of Petitioner’s request, the undersigned GRANTS Petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly, the undersigned awards:

A lump sum in the amount of $52,677.73, representing reimbursement for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and Petitioner’s counsel of record, Ms. Nancy Meyers.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with this Decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 /s/ Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master