Parker v. Parker

65 S.E.2d 794, 208 Ga. 190, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 311
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 9, 1951·No. 17502·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Head, Justice.

The acknowledgment of counsel for the defendant in error was in compliance with section 7 of the act approved February 1, 1946 (Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 735, Code, Ann. Supp., § 6-908.1), and is limited in its approval to the correctness and completeness of the bill of exceptions for presentation to the trial judge. It did not amount to a waiver of service of the bill of exceptions after approval by the trial judge. There being no service or waiver of service of the bill of exceptions, as contemplated by the Code, §§ 6-911, 6-912, it is fatally defective. Henry v. Gillis, 204 Ga. 397 (50 S. E. 2d, 73). Nothing said by this court in Barwick v. Wind, 203 Ga. 827 (48 S. E. 2d, 523), is in conflict with the above ruling.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Parker, 65 S.E.2d 794, 208 Ga. 190, 1951 Ga. LEXIS 311 (Ga. 1951).

65 S.E.2d 794 (Parker v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman v. American Insurance
129 S.E.2d 211 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Barbaree v. Coffin
92 S.E.2d 860 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1956)
Carnes v. Pittman
74 S.E.2d 852 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Peterson v. Peterson
74 S.E.2d 549 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Branham v. Branham
72 S.E.2d 713 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)