Parker v. Hoefer
136 N.E.2d 709, 1 N.Y.2d 873
This text of 136 N.E.2d 709 (Parker v. Hoefer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Parker v. Hoefer, 136 N.E.2d 709, 1 N.Y.2d 873 (N.Y. 1956).
Opinions
[874]*874Appeal dismissed upon the ground that no constitutional question is directly involved (Civ. Prac. Act, § 588, subd. 1, par. [a]). We pass upon no other question.
Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld and Burke, JJ. Van Voorhis, J., dissents in the following opinion in which Froessel, J., concurs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Moreno-Godoy v. Kartagener
7 F.4th 78 (Second Circuit, 2021)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
136 N.E.2d 709, 1 N.Y.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-hoefer-ny-1956.