Parker v. Hill

122 P. 618, 68 Wash. 134, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1260
Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 1912·No. No. 10106·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Mount, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, to set aside and cancel six certain real estate mortgages securing the payment of six promissory notes aggregating $125,-600. These notes and mortgages were executed by the Hollon Parker Company, a corporation, by O. G. Parker, its secretary, and are now held by the receiver of the Walla Walla Fire Insurance Company, an insolvent corporation. The plaintiff seeks to set these mortgages aside, upon the ground that they were wrongfully and fraudulently issued, without consideration, and without authority of the Hollon Parker Company, and without knowledge or notice to the plaintiff. The defendant Hollon Parker Company made no answer. The defendant Dorsey M. Hill, receiver of the Walla Walla Fire Insurance Company, answered the complaint, and denied the allegations of fraud, want of consideration, etc., and by cross-complaint sought a foreclosure of the mortgages. Upon a trial of these issues, the court found that the mortgages were fraudulently issued, substantially as alleged, and entered a decree as prayed for in the complaint. The receiver has appealed.

The facts, in brief, are substantially as follows: The plaintiff, Hollon Parker, prior to the year 1904, had acquired large tracts of valuable farming lands in Walla Walla and Columbia counties, in this state. He also owned a number of city lots in the city of Walla Walla, a few of which were improved, the rest vacant and unimproved. In December of 1904, he formed a corporation called the Hollon Parker Company, with its principal place of business at Walla Walla, Washington. This corporation has a capital stock of one thousand shares of the par value of $10 each. He subscribed for 996 of these shares. His only son, Orrin G. Parker, subscribed for one share, C. K. Holloway one share, Lester S. Wilson one share, and S. E. King one. share. Mr. Hollon Parker thereupon deeded to this corporation a large part of his real estate, including the property in controversy, except the two parcels hereinafter referred to. [136] The value of the property thus conveyed to this corporation was about $300,000. He testified that his object in forming this corporation was for a mere holding corporation for the convenient disposition of his property after his death. At that time he was seventy-two years of age. The objects of the corporation, as stated in the articles, are as follows:

“The object and purpose for which this corporation is formed is to purchase, own, control, lease and sell real and personal property for and on its own account, or on commission as agent for others as may be convenient, desirable or necessary in the conduct of its business; to build, either as owner or for other persons, all manner of structures, and to sell, lease, or otherwise dispose of the same if on its own account, and for a fixed compensation if for the use and benefit of other persons or corporations. To own and hold stock of other corporations and to sell or otherwise dispose of the same if desirable. To act as trustee; to accept and execute any trust fiduciary or otherwise, which may be committed to it by any person, corporation or committee, or by the order or direction of any court. To act as escrow holding agent for others in the negotiation of loans, purchase of stock, bonds or other securities, or in the sale thereof for a commission and to make loans on real or personal security. To own and operate warehouses whether for public or private use and to collect, if for public use, a charge of storage. To engage in the business of farming and the marketing of all kinds of farm products; or raising any or all kinds of live stock and to sell or otherwise dispose of the same and to do such other business in connection with the aforesaid as may properly be consistent with the objects and purposes of this corporation.”

At the first meeting of the stockholders, all of whom were trustees, Mr. Hollon Parker was elected president and his son, Orrin G. Parker, was elected secretary and treasurer. Thereafter for two or three years, Mr. Orrin G. Parker and C. K. Holloway did an extensive loan business in the name of the Hollon Parker Company. Mr. Hollon Parker knew of this business and made no objections thereto. The proceeds of this loan business appear to have been divided [137] between Orrin G. Parker and C. K. Holloway. Mr. Hollon Parker appears to have received the rents of the real estate belonging to the corporation. In May of 1905, Mr. Hollon Parker, being in poor health, left Walla Walla and went to Seattle, where he remained a few months, and then went to Portland, Oregon, where he has remained ever since. In December of 1906, he executed a declaration of trust as follows:

“For the purposes herein stated, I hereby appoint Orrin G. Parker and C. K. Holloway joint trustees and hereby assign and deliver to them as such for my own use as hereinafter stated, all the shares of the capital stock of the Hollon Parker Company, a corporation under the laws of Washington, standing in my name or to which I may be entitled, and I hereby authorize said trustees to surrender to the secretary of the said corporation all shares of said stock outstanding in my name for the purpose of having new stock issued to them upon the books of said company as such trustees.
“(1) I hereby reserve during the period of my life the issues and profits accruing to the ownership of said shares of stock.
“(2) Upon my death, I direct my trustees herein named to vote, manage and control the said stock in such way as to them seems best for the interests of said company, and after payment of the expenses of operation of said company any profits derived therefrom shall be re-invested by said trustees in such manner as may be agreeable, until the infant son of Orrin G. Parker (my grandson) shall arrive at the age of majority, at which time said trusteeship shall terminate, provided that said Orrin G. Parker shall not then be the father of any other living children not of age; but if such be the case, that is to say, if he shall have other children then living, then said trusteeship shall continue until the youngest living child shall arrive at the age of maj ority.
“(3) In case of the death of both my said son Orrin G. Parker and his son (my grandson), then I direct that my trustees or the survivors of them shall continue to manage and control said stock and devote the proceeds arising therefrom under the direction of the trustees of Whitman college, [138] located at Walla Walla, Washington, in the same manner as provision has been made in my will for the income from my ‘Dixie farm,’ it being my expressed wish and desire that said stock shall never pass into the possession or control of the wife of my said son or her heirs and assigns other than as the same shall in law be the heirs of my said son, Orrin G. Parker.
“(4) I direct my trustees hereinbefore named as soon as there shall be a vacancy in the present board of trustees, to issue to my lifelong friend J. B. Gehr, one share of said capital stock so that he may qualify as one of the board of trustees of said corporation.
“(5) In case of the death of either of said Orrin G. Parker and C. K. Holloway, I request that D. H. Cox, first, and O. P. Jaycox, second, be appointed as successors to such deceased trustee or trustees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker v. Hill, 122 P. 618, 68 Wash. 134, 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1260 (Wash. 1912).

122 P. 618 (Parker v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Betz v. Tacoma Drug Co.
131 P.2d 183 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Gaikema v. Bank of Alaska
8 Alaska 495 (D. Alaska, 1934)
Button v. Traders Trust Co.
289 P. 1010 (Washington Supreme Court, 1930)
Citizens Bank v. Public Drug Co.
190 Iowa 983 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1921)
Kucher v. Scott
165 P. 82 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)
Union Savings & Trust Co. v. Krumm
152 P. 681 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Puget Sound Realty Associates v. Catlett
145 P. 617 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Pacific State Bank v. Coats
205 F. 618 (Ninth Circuit, 1913)
Parker v. Hill
122 P. 623 (Washington Supreme Court, 1912)