Parker v. Barefoot

519 S.E.2d 315, 351 N.C. 40
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 8, 1999
Docket408A98
StatusPublished

This text of 519 S.E.2d 315 (Parker v. Barefoot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parker v. Barefoot, 519 S.E.2d 315, 351 N.C. 40 (N.C. 1999).

Opinion

519 S.E.2d 315 (1999)
351 N.C. 40

Wilton B. PARKER, Shirley K. Parker, Randy Parker, Janet T. Parker, Gary Parker, Diane P. Parker, Keith Parker, Darlene W. Parker, James Alan Parker, Ann D. Parker, Keith Slocum, Eugene Barbour, Dixie Barbour, Vernon Thompson, Patricia Thompson, Delbert Allen, Jr., Deborah Blackmon, Bettie C. Upchurch, Glenn Twigg, Administrator of the Estate of Pharo Twigg, Della T. Twigg, Thomas Earl Toole, Mayrlene Toole, Christine P. Thompson, Laurcey Massengill, Charlie Matthews and Lorraine Matthews
v.
W. Terry BAREFOOT and Rita J. Barefoot.

No. 408A98.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 8, 1999.

Morgan, Reeves & Gilchrist, by Robert B. Morgan and Mary Morgan Reeves, Lillington, for plaintiff-appellees.

Bode, Call & Stroupe, L.L.P., by John V. Hunter III and Diana E. Ricketts, Raleigh; and Narron, O'Hale & Whittington, by John P. O'Hale, Smithfield, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissent of Judge John Martin in the Court of Appeals, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Justice FREEMAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Barefoot
519 S.E.2d 315 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
519 S.E.2d 315, 351 N.C. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parker-v-barefoot-nc-1999.