Parker-Lauer Realty Co. v. Long Island Railroad

263 A.D. 955, 32 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7584
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1942·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Action to recover real estate brokerage commissions. Order modifying appellant’s demand for a bill of particulars modified on the law and the facts as follows: (1) By inserting a provision that if plaintiff, acting in good faith, has no present knowledge as to any of the matters as to which it is required to give particulars, it should so state under oath; and (2) by striking from the order everything following the word “ only ” in the third ordering paragraph. As thus modified, .the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant, the bill of particulars to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Under the facts of this case, since the record does not disclose that any application to examine the defendants before trial was pending, the direction that the bill of particulars be served within twenty days after the completion of an examination of defendants before trial was an improper exercise of the court’s discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker-Lauer Realty Co. v. Long Island Railroad, 263 A.D. 955, 32 N.Y.S.2d 737, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

263 A.D. 955 (Parker-Lauer Realty Co. v. Long Island Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Emenee Industries, Inc.
22 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Thompson v. Shevlin
43 Misc. 2d 1078 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Tuma v. Ford Motor Co.
38 Misc. 2d 528 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Runals v. Niagara University
16 Misc. 2d 853 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Propp v. Rothenberg
16 Misc. 2d 584 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Krstulja v. Krstulja
200 Misc. 186 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)
Grandfield v. Grandfield
277 A.D.2d 881 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
In re the Probate of the Will of Ernst
194 Misc. 237 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
Schlank v. East River Savings Bank
272 A.D.2d 56 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)