Parkchester Apartments Co. v. Scott

271 A.D.2d 273, 707 N.Y.S.2d 55, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4102
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 13, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 271 A.D.2d 273 (Parkchester Apartments Co. v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Parkchester Apartments Co. v. Scott, 271 A.D.2d 273, 707 N.Y.S.2d 55, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department (Parness, J. P., and Davis, J.; McCooe, J., dissenting), entered on or about April 1, 1999, which affirmed an order of the Civil Court, Bronx County (Howard Sherman, J.), entered on or about March 13, 1998, granting respondent tenant’s motion to be restored to possession upon his payment of $6,825, representing accrued rent, costs and fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner landlord’s claim premised on RPAPL 747-a, that Civil Court lacked authority to grant respondent tenant’s post-eviction application for, inter alia, a stay of the re-letting of the subject apartment, is without merit. The record indicates that respondent tenant’s application was accompanied by a sworn statement with a money order attached, apparently in the amount of $4,000, which exceeded the combined amount of the balance due on the judgment, i.e., $2,405, plus additional rent that had accrued since the date of the judgment. Moreover, good cause to support the Civil Court’s vacatur of the warrant [274]*274of eviction was demonstrated through proof from the 63-year-old tenant that, notwithstanding recent illness, he made appreciable payments towards the judgment and, while a tenant for 20 years, had apparently had no prior delinquency record and, prospectively, had arranged for automatic withdrawal of monthly rent from his bank account. Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

591 Realty, LLC v. Jenkins
85 Misc. 3d 131(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
541-543 W. 150th St. LLC v. Allen
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018
Thamer Props. Corp. v. Nava
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018
2203 Belmont Realty Corp. v. Gant
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
Matter of Lafayette Boynton Hsg. Corp. v. Pickett
135 A.D.3d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
CRJ Realty Corp. v. Espinal
45 Misc. 3d 74 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Harvey 1390 LLC v. Bodenheim
96 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Landmark Properties v. Olivo
10 Misc. 3d 1 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
New York City Housing Authority-Edenwald Houses v. Roque
1 Misc. 3d 833 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2003)
210 Realty Associates v. O'Connor
302 A.D.2d 396 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
102-116 Eighth Avenue Associates, L.P. v. Oyola
299 A.D.2d 296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
4220 Broadway Associates v. Perez
187 Misc. 2d 602 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 273, 707 N.Y.S.2d 55, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/parkchester-apartments-co-v-scott-nyappdiv-2000.