Parisien v. Citiwide Auto Leasing
Opinion
against
Citiwide Auto Leasing, Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Miller, Leiby & Associates, P.C. (Evan Mizrahi of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered August 1, 2017. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath.
For the reasons stated in Right Aid Med. Supply Corp., as Assignee of Kusi Comfort v Ameriprise Auto & Home (___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2017-1776 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 02, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parisien v. Citiwide Auto Leasing (Parisien v. Citiwide Auto Leasing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.