Parisien v. Citiwide Auto Leasing
Opinion
against
Citiwide Auto Leasing, Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Miller, Leiby & Associates, P.C. (Eve Pachter of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (John J. Kelley, J.), entered March 2, 2016. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff's assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs).
Contrary to plaintiff's argument, the proof submitted by defendant was sufficient to give rise to a presumption that the IME scheduling letters had been properly mailed (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]).
Plaintiff's remaining contention is not properly before this court, as this argument is being raised for the first time on appeal (see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc., 88 AD3d 963 [2011]; Gulf Ins. Co. v Kanen, 13 AD3d 579 [2004]), and we decline to consider it.
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 23, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Parisien v. Citiwide Auto Leasing (Parisien v. Citiwide Auto Leasing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.