Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Paris v. State

Paris v. State

170 So. 3d 914, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11275, 2015 WL 4522596
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 999 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 27, 2015·No. No. 1D14-5671·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having reviewed the entire record on appeal, we affirm Appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we do so without prejudice to Appellant’s filing a post-conviction motion to correct unpreserved sentencing errors related to investigative costs imposed. See Norton v. State, 160 So.3d 528 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015).

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, MARSTILLER, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paris v. State, 170 So. 3d 914, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 11275, 2015 WL 4522596 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

170 So. 3d 914 (Paris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Norton v. State
160 So. 3d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)